It can be upheld. German he can. One of the two he can do better. And that is not German. And yet it is a pleasure to read his explanation for his PhD. Because it is so interesting what he says and what he does not say. He says much at all. He has practiced well on his doctorate.
Here his statement in the text.
needed "for this opinion is no call and it was not written by me, my dissertation is not plagiarism, and the accusation, I would emphatically to me than it is about seven. years in addition to my professional work and Members emerged as a young family man with painstaking work and it undoubtedly contains errors. And on each of these errors, I am a most unhappy.Zur Charakterisierung seiner veränderten Plagiate vgl. Zettels Raum .
It was however disappointed at no time aware or not aware of authorship identified. If someone set by this or by incorrect and quoting injured or missed setting footnotes in a total of 1300 footnotes and 475 pages feel, so I am truly sorry for that. The detailed assessment and weighting of these errors is for now the University of Bayreuth.
I will help determine course actively to what extent is a science, and I emphasize a scientific misconduct could be. And I would like to result of this test temporarily, I stress, temporarily renounce the use of title, but only up to that, then I would take him again.
I will create no other standard than I would have recognized in others. Any further communication on the subject I will carry from now on exclusively with the University of Bayreuth. The people of this country expect me to take care of the demanding post of defense minister in full force and I can too. We are facing a historic reform of the Bundeswehr. And I carry the responsibility for the soldiers in action, as an event dem heutigen Tag einmal mehr auf bittere Weise zeigt."
Kommentar von Peter von Becker in ZEIT online 20.2.11
0 comments:
Post a Comment