What speaks for Guttenberg:
first What he had planned to have a demand on others also. The theme was for a thesis too broad. Professor Häberle did not ensure that the issue was cut to the real possibilities of doctoral students.
second It does seem only to the outside as if the would take the criticism seriously. (See this picture )
third In contrast to the claim that Guttenberg had encouraged fraud, he has rather - involuntarily - Will be cheated pointed out boldly as promotions and that some of the professors in some cases of apparently approvingly accepted.
that he has contributed, could lead to some reduction of fraud culture.
What still speaks against Guttenberg:
All that speaks for him, he has not been willing to admit.
What is hope: That
Guttenberg following notice of Prime Minister Bohemian observed:
There are things that are in the public quickly forgot strange. Others do not. This has influence on the political significance. (Wolfgang Böhmer (CDU) in the Tagesspiegel, 26.2.11)
That will forget the promotion of fraud, but can do a lot of Guttenberg. Either the fact that he resigns or the fact that he's really good good job.
In my opinion both are relatively unlikely. But a good politician proved himself in the crisis. The talent to good politician Guttenberg, whether he has what it takes to learn from this crisis, what is needed to be seen.
wants what the people?
0 comments:
Post a Comment