family court judge may at any / all are, who has / have completed the legal education and for a year as a Judge is active. Special psychological / family dynamic knowledge and communication skills are not required. The perception of supervision and training for judges is not mandatory. The Federal Ministry of Justice considers this an undue restriction of judicial independence. Professional standards, as in other professions that have to do with children, such as nurses in procedures, there is not. This is justified by the independence of the judiciary. It is no surprise that some judges / judges to blatant Wrong decisions is. Some judgments of family judges sometimes one has the impression that there gave more injured sensibilities of the judge in the decision to the decision, rather than focus on child welfare.
Maybe some family judges something presented another under its occupation, some wanted to maybe work up their own as a child suffered separation trauma, the others wanted to become specialists in spousal support, because their charge that the school is always so much fun. And now they have to do it all at once with so much emotion and practical psychology. Because in the long run is only one thing, set either to blinkers and arrogance, to make friends with the hitherto so unloved subject and serious consideration, or to change jobs and as lawyer specializing in family law, because that is after all not responsible for the child and may be sometimes sadistic, without him the state crooked does.
The family court on its own communication psychological features prevail, each will be clear who has long dealt with the matter. Since there are, as in ordinary life outside the door of the District Court, judges unspoken deal between family caregivers and procedures, family judges and lawyers, judges and family experts etc.. Just as the saying goes, "In life you always look twice."
Do you do me a favor now, I do you a favor later, is the unspoken motto. The family judge may think, if the expert determined what I already have in mind the next time he gets another job, if not, then he has had bad luck and I am looking for another. The guardian ad litem, who is supposed to independently represent the interests of the child, depending on the judge, as the latter would indeed ordered. Episode, the guardian ad litem will be careful not to put forward something where he brings in a sharp contrast to the judge. The lawyer has since even easier. He is financially limited by the judge-dependent. Quite apart is he not, since the granting of legal aid for his client in a particular case depends on the judge. If the lawyer financially dependent on legal aid and that might be the majority of the lawyers, he also will tend to hold more foreign exchange, the judge not to offend too much.
The naive layman suspects nothing and thinks is in there, although not necessarily according to his will, but at least everything above board, meanwhile, are in fact the decisions already made because certain people are involved in the process.
Source: vaeternotruf.de